Democratization and War in Political Science
Democratization 15(3): 509–24.
This article explores what political science literature has to say about the promises and perils of expanding democratic governance. International relations literature and comparative politics literature both deal with the claim that stable democracies do not fight each other. However, these two strands of literature only to a minor extent exchange research findings on the causes of war. International relations scholars are well aware of the fact that the early stages of democratization in particular may trigger conflict, and they explain that they are referring to the size of a country’s power and the distribution of capabilities among the major powers, among other factors. In contrast, comparativists focus on the opening of domestic political space. In a transitional state, open political space fosters elite competition, which cannot be regulated by weak political institutions and therefore may cause civil war. They are less aware of the fact that these internal dynamics may even enhance the risk of political violence beyond territorial borders. Both of these approaches must be used to focus on the consequences of democratization on a regional scale. In bad neighbourhoods’, including the Balkans, the Caucasus, the Middle East and the Great Lakes in Africa, democratization can trigger conflict beyond state frontiers by altering the incentives and opportunities of political actors.
DOI:
10.1080/13510340801972247Cederman, Lars-Erik, Simon Hug, and Andreas Wenger. 2008. “Democratization and War in Political Science.” Democratization 15(3): 509–24.
@Article{democratization-and-war-in-political-science,
Title = {Democratization and War in Political Science},
Author = {Cederman, Lars-Erik and Hug, Simon and Wenger, Andreas},
Journal = {Democratization},
Year = {2008},
Number = {3},
Pages = {509--524},
Volume = {15},
abstract = {This article explores what political science literature has to say about the promises and perils of expanding democratic governance. International relations literature and comparative politics literature both deal with the claim that stable democracies do not fight each other. However, these two strands of literature only to a minor extent exchange research findings on the causes of war. International relations scholars are well aware of the fact that the early stages of democratization in particular may trigger conflict, and they explain that they are referring to the size of a country's power and the distribution of capabilities among the major powers, among other factors. In contrast, comparativists focus on the opening of domestic political space. In a transitional state, open political space fosters elite competition, which cannot be regulated by weak political institutions and therefore may cause civil war. They are less aware of the fact that these internal dynamics may even enhance the risk of political violence beyond territorial borders. Both of these approaches must be used to focus on the consequences of democratization on a regional scale. In \Elzreapos bad neighbourhoods', including the Balkans, the Caucasus, the Middle East and the Great Lakes in Africa, democratization can trigger conflict beyond state frontiers by altering the incentives and opportunities of political actors.},
doi = {10.1080/13510340801972247},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510340801972247},
pdf = {http://www.icr.ethz.ch/publications/cederman2007democratization2.pdf}
}